Not sure what you call it- when an ‘upgrade’ turns out to be a ‘downgrade’, so when you roll back to the earlier version, it is simpler to think of it as a ‘retrograde’! Or something.

I ‘upgraded’ my Torque Workcentre about 6 – 8 months ago (I’m sure there is a post about it at the time) where there was a new concept for the MDF top to have tracks rather than a basic flat, featureless top you screwed things to, or my adaption which was the series of 20mm holes, 100mm apart, with Walko clamps (from Ideal Tools).

Sorry, but hated the upgrade. (Not to put a too-fine a point on it). The top ends up not being really flat, the slots cause issue when moving work across them, such as pin routing or circle cutting (an issue highlighted at the recent Berwick Woodworkers training day), and more than anything else, the tracks quickly fill up with crap and swiftly become unusable.


So I’m looking at these tracks, and asking myself a very simple question- why keep them? I have a much better solution just 19mm below the new top- the existing previous top, complete with Walko/Festool workbench style holes.

So quicker than the new top was added to the machine months ago, it was ‘unadded’, aka ‘retrograded’ aka taking the concept, ditching it into the bin, and returning to a system that had no issues needing to be corrected.


A sense of normalicy floods over the workshop.

%d bloggers like this: